La ganancia acumulada en el primer semestre del 2014 es de 1523,94 millones que es un 130% más de lo que ganaba en el primer semestre del 2013. En tan sólo éste trimestre tuvo más superhabit que todo el segundo trimestre del año pasado: 693,24 millones.}
Los ingresos operativos un 45,53%, comparando los primeros semestres del 2013/2014, donde el resultado financiero neto subió un 56,39% y los ingresos por servicios un 28,59%.
Los cargos por incobrabilidad subieron 42,57% comparando los semestres. Los Gastos Administración, por su parte, aumentaron un 22,57%.
Los títulos crecieron un 159%, casi la mitad de la cartera está compuesto por letras de B.C.R.A a costo más rendimiento.
El Margen bruto de intermediación financiera creció de 3060,18 millones a 4785,94 millones, es decir un 56,39% de aumento.
El aumento de fondos en efectivo fue de 5416 millones, en igual semestre del 2013 perdió -568,22 millones.
El ROE es de 39,27%. En el primer semestre del 2013 fue de 25,77%
El ROA es de 3,68%. En el primer semestre del 2013 fue de 2,34%
Los activos líquidos crecieron de 0,5315 a 0,8482. La solvencia aumentó de 8,45 a 9,54
El 24 de Abril del 2014, se resolvió absorber las acciones de GALI (Banco Galicia de Buenos Aires) por lo que el capital suscripto pasó de 1241,40 millones de acciones a 1300,26 millones.
El VL asciende a 6,49. La Cotización hoy es de 15,25.
La ganancia por acción es de 1,17. El PER anualizado, descartando los dividendos, es 7,38
GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Mitridates escribió:...yo en promedio le pego mas veces que PAPU...
Naaahhh pero que tipo más irrespetuoso que sos, Mitri. ¿Acaso viste lo que le hizo a PBR? Cada vez me da más miedo.
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
sabrina escribió:No estabas líquido too?
Me parece que me paso la gran Sabri
compre ayer 300 lotecitos de PESA a 0.01 y hoy no los quize largar a ,10
me contagiaste la ambición
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
isidoro999 escribió:quote="Aprendiendo"Hasta cuándo hay tiempo de ejercer las opciones?
Depende la sociedad de bolsa , algunos te permiten hasta mañana a las 16.00 hs. Otras te dan hasta un 2do turno el viernes a las 12.30. Sugiero que llames a tu agente de bolsa y le consultes
isidoro999 , el segundo turno sería una locura, si podemos llegar el viernes ver la apertura y
decidir o desistir ejercer , además de tener tiempo hasta las 12:30hs
ERROR el segundo turno vence mañana entre las 15:30 hasta 18:30hs aprox. ,
se puede enmendar alguna base que la Soc. de Bolsa no haya ejercido,
por ejemplo GGAL 13,97, si cierre y apertura son por arriba del precio.
Solo si el mercado y la contraparte aceptan , si no alpiste.
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Koshka2 escribió:que bueno que son la gente que se encarga de informarnos.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101906426#.
publicado 10 min despues que cerro el mercado, no lo pusieron antes para no amargar a nadie
en el after solo TEO tiene unas pocas acciones a la baja, justo a la misma hora que esto
veremos mañana
justo que estaba por decir que los cierres parecían indicar un rebotin mañana
Mañana baja mas en USA, aca el CCL aumenta (Se mantiene la tendencia de Fedio en el MERVAL). Ahi compran acciones y bonos regalados (Sobretodo que los bonos tienen que estar bien bajos para el 21 -Por el ISDA-).
El 25 arreglan, las acciones suben y negocio redondo.
-
Mitridates
- Mensajes: 3952
- Registrado: Vie Ene 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Utopista gracias , la aestoy pasando muy bien.
Sabri
que se vuelva a repetir.
Sabri
que se vuelva a repetir.
sabrina escribió:Hola Mitri
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Jajodé ... resulta ahora que JPMorgan esta ofendido por maltrato .... Pordió
Que novela Kafkiana
Que novela Kafkiana
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Koshka2 escribió:que bueno que son la gente que se encarga de informarnos.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101906426#.
publicado 10 min despues que cerro el mercado, no lo pusieron antes para no amargar a nadie
en el after solo TEO tiene unas pocas acciones a la baja, justo a la misma hora que esto
veremos mañana
justo que estaba por decir que los cierres parecían indicar un rebotin mañana
No estabas líquido too?
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
que bueno que son la gente que se encarga de informarnos.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101906426#.
publicado 10 min despues que cerro el mercado, no lo pusieron antes para no amargar a nadie
en el after solo TEO tiene unas pocas acciones a la baja, justo a la misma hora que esto
veremos mañana
justo que estaba por decir que los cierres parecían indicar un rebotin mañana
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101906426#.
publicado 10 min despues que cerro el mercado, no lo pusieron antes para no amargar a nadie
en el after solo TEO tiene unas pocas acciones a la baja, justo a la misma hora que esto
veremos mañana
justo que estaba por decir que los cierres parecían indicar un rebotin mañana
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Hola Mitri
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Talks for private deal on Argentine bonds collapse
Kate Kelly | @katekellycnbc
51 Mins Ago
CNBC.com
83
SHARES
5
COMMENTSJoin the Discussion
Talks between a group of global banks and at least one major hedge fund about buying a portion of the fund's exposure to Argentine debt have collapsed, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC, amid concerns that the Argentine government has dug in to its refusal to pay certain creditors what they are owed and may not relent for months to come.
In recent weeks, representatives for NML Capital, a subsidiary unit of the $25 billion hedge fund company Elliott Management, had negotiated with counterparts at JPMorgan, Citigroup, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank about the possibility of buying at least part of NML's position in Argentine government bonds.
Argentina entered a state of default on July 31 after refusing to pay what it owed to NML and certain other creditors, arguing that the group was made up of "vulture" investors whose demands for capital from the economically troubled country were unreasonable.
Read MoreArgentina calls on US to intervene
The idea behind the bank discussions with NML, people briefed on the matter have said, was that Argentina might look more kindly upon international banks like JPMorgan than it would have on a group of tough-talking hedge funds, and therefore might have been more likely to pay off at least part of the roughly $1.3 billion it owed those bondholders as of late July.
But that thinking changed when it appeared that the Argentine government's own aggressive stance seemed to be hardening. The signs included filing suit against the United States, where the disputed bonds are domiciled, in the International Court of Justice; sharply criticizing both a federal judge and a mediator appointed to broker a solution between the country and NML and some of its other investors; and purchasing a two-page ad in the Wall Street Journal exhorting some of its friendlier bondholders to take action to protect their investments.
Kate Kelly | @katekellycnbc
51 Mins Ago
CNBC.com
83
SHARES
5
COMMENTSJoin the Discussion
Talks between a group of global banks and at least one major hedge fund about buying a portion of the fund's exposure to Argentine debt have collapsed, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC, amid concerns that the Argentine government has dug in to its refusal to pay certain creditors what they are owed and may not relent for months to come.
In recent weeks, representatives for NML Capital, a subsidiary unit of the $25 billion hedge fund company Elliott Management, had negotiated with counterparts at JPMorgan, Citigroup, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank about the possibility of buying at least part of NML's position in Argentine government bonds.
Argentina entered a state of default on July 31 after refusing to pay what it owed to NML and certain other creditors, arguing that the group was made up of "vulture" investors whose demands for capital from the economically troubled country were unreasonable.
Read MoreArgentina calls on US to intervene
The idea behind the bank discussions with NML, people briefed on the matter have said, was that Argentina might look more kindly upon international banks like JPMorgan than it would have on a group of tough-talking hedge funds, and therefore might have been more likely to pay off at least part of the roughly $1.3 billion it owed those bondholders as of late July.
But that thinking changed when it appeared that the Argentine government's own aggressive stance seemed to be hardening. The signs included filing suit against the United States, where the disputed bonds are domiciled, in the International Court of Justice; sharply criticizing both a federal judge and a mediator appointed to broker a solution between the country and NML and some of its other investors; and purchasing a two-page ad in the Wall Street Journal exhorting some of its friendlier bondholders to take action to protect their investments.
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Talks for private deal on Argentine bonds collapse
Kate Kelly | @katekellycnbc
51 Mins Ago
CNBC.com
83
SHARES
5
COMMENTSJoin the Discussion
Talks between a group of global banks and at least one major hedge fund about buying a portion of the fund's exposure to Argentine debt have collapsed, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC, amid concerns that the Argentine government has dug in to its refusal to pay certain creditors what they are owed and may not relent for months to come.
In recent weeks, representatives for NML Capital, a subsidiary unit of the $25 billion hedge fund company Elliott Management, had negotiated with counterparts at JPMorgan, Citigroup, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank about the possibility of buying at least part of NML's position in Argentine government bonds.
Argentina entered a state of default on July 31 after refusing to pay what it owed to NML and certain other creditors, arguing that the group was made up of "vulture" investors whose demands for capital from the economically troubled country were unreasonable.
Read MoreArgentina calls on US to intervene
The idea behind the bank discussions with NML, people briefed on the matter have said, was that Argentina might look more kindly upon international banks like JPMorgan than it would have on a group of tough-talking hedge funds, and therefore might have been more likely to pay off at least part of the roughly $1.3 billion it owed those bondholders as of late July.
But that thinking changed when it appeared that the Argentine government's own aggressive stance seemed to be hardening. The signs included filing suit against the United States, where the disputed bonds are domiciled, in the International Court of Justice; sharply criticizing both a federal judge and a mediator appointed to broker a solution between the country and NML and some of its other investors; and purchasing a two-page ad in the Wall Street Journal exhorting some of its friendlier bondholders to take action to protect their investments.
Kate Kelly | @katekellycnbc
51 Mins Ago
CNBC.com
83
SHARES
5
COMMENTSJoin the Discussion
Talks between a group of global banks and at least one major hedge fund about buying a portion of the fund's exposure to Argentine debt have collapsed, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC, amid concerns that the Argentine government has dug in to its refusal to pay certain creditors what they are owed and may not relent for months to come.
In recent weeks, representatives for NML Capital, a subsidiary unit of the $25 billion hedge fund company Elliott Management, had negotiated with counterparts at JPMorgan, Citigroup, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank about the possibility of buying at least part of NML's position in Argentine government bonds.
Argentina entered a state of default on July 31 after refusing to pay what it owed to NML and certain other creditors, arguing that the group was made up of "vulture" investors whose demands for capital from the economically troubled country were unreasonable.
Read MoreArgentina calls on US to intervene
The idea behind the bank discussions with NML, people briefed on the matter have said, was that Argentina might look more kindly upon international banks like JPMorgan than it would have on a group of tough-talking hedge funds, and therefore might have been more likely to pay off at least part of the roughly $1.3 billion it owed those bondholders as of late July.
But that thinking changed when it appeared that the Argentine government's own aggressive stance seemed to be hardening. The signs included filing suit against the United States, where the disputed bonds are domiciled, in the International Court of Justice; sharply criticizing both a federal judge and a mediator appointed to broker a solution between the country and NML and some of its other investors; and purchasing a two-page ad in the Wall Street Journal exhorting some of its friendlier bondholders to take action to protect their investments.
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Talks for private deal on Argentine bonds collapse
Kate Kelly | @katekellycnbc
51 Mins Ago
CNBC.com
83
SHARES
5
COMMENTSJoin the Discussion
Talks between a group of global banks and at least one major hedge fund about buying a portion of the fund's exposure to Argentine debt have collapsed, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC, amid concerns that the Argentine government has dug in to its refusal to pay certain creditors what they are owed and may not relent for months to come.
In recent weeks, representatives for NML Capital, a subsidiary unit of the $25 billion hedge fund company Elliott Management, had negotiated with counterparts at JPMorgan, Citigroup, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank about the possibility of buying at least part of NML's position in Argentine government bonds.
Argentina entered a state of default on July 31 after refusing to pay what it owed to NML and certain other creditors, arguing that the group was made up of "vulture" investors whose demands for capital from the economically troubled country were unreasonable.
Read MoreArgentina calls on US to intervene
The idea behind the bank discussions with NML, people briefed on the matter have said, was that Argentina might look more kindly upon international banks like JPMorgan than it would have on a group of tough-talking hedge funds, and therefore might have been more likely to pay off at least part of the roughly $1.3 billion it owed those bondholders as of late July.
But that thinking changed when it appeared that the Argentine government's own aggressive stance seemed to be hardening. The signs included filing suit against the United States, where the disputed bonds are domiciled, in the International Court of Justice; sharply criticizing both a federal judge and a mediator appointed to broker a solution between the country and NML and some of its other investors; and purchasing a two-page ad in the Wall Street Journal exhorting some of its friendlier bondholders to take action to protect their investments.
Kate Kelly | @katekellycnbc
51 Mins Ago
CNBC.com
83
SHARES
5
COMMENTSJoin the Discussion
Talks between a group of global banks and at least one major hedge fund about buying a portion of the fund's exposure to Argentine debt have collapsed, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC, amid concerns that the Argentine government has dug in to its refusal to pay certain creditors what they are owed and may not relent for months to come.
In recent weeks, representatives for NML Capital, a subsidiary unit of the $25 billion hedge fund company Elliott Management, had negotiated with counterparts at JPMorgan, Citigroup, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank about the possibility of buying at least part of NML's position in Argentine government bonds.
Argentina entered a state of default on July 31 after refusing to pay what it owed to NML and certain other creditors, arguing that the group was made up of "vulture" investors whose demands for capital from the economically troubled country were unreasonable.
Read MoreArgentina calls on US to intervene
The idea behind the bank discussions with NML, people briefed on the matter have said, was that Argentina might look more kindly upon international banks like JPMorgan than it would have on a group of tough-talking hedge funds, and therefore might have been more likely to pay off at least part of the roughly $1.3 billion it owed those bondholders as of late July.
But that thinking changed when it appeared that the Argentine government's own aggressive stance seemed to be hardening. The signs included filing suit against the United States, where the disputed bonds are domiciled, in the International Court of Justice; sharply criticizing both a federal judge and a mediator appointed to broker a solution between the country and NML and some of its other investors; and purchasing a two-page ad in the Wall Street Journal exhorting some of its friendlier bondholders to take action to protect their investments.
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
Mitridates escribió:nor este de espania un pueblo que ni se como se llama en los pirineos.
¿Torla? ¿Estas cerca del Monte Perdido?
¿O Aínsa?
Es espectacular esa zona, pasala bien.
-
Mitridates
- Mensajes: 3952
- Registrado: Vie Ene 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia
no que afrodita ni afrodita, a PAPU lo tenes de foronovio, siempre le dejas corasonsitos y te tengo que decir que me pongo celoso, por que yo en promedio le pego mas veces que PAPU y siento que me los merezco por esa razón, pero vos ni siquiera me miras y no me dejas ni un ..............
.............. sabrina escribió:jajajaj no lo conozco a papu! me estás confundiendo con Afrodita!
El tema es también lo que hablaban ayer, creo
¿Quién está conectado?
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: Ahrefs [Bot], alzamer, Amazon [Bot], andy_cayn, Antifáz, Bing [Bot], bohemio33, caballo, cabeza70, carlos_2681, chewbaca, choke, cuchocho, danidani, Danilo, DON VINCENZO, DuckDuckGo [Bot], el indio, elcipayo16, ElCont@dor, Fercap, fidelius, Gabye, Gon, Google [Bot], Guardameta, iceman, j5orge, Majestic-12 [Bot], MarianoAD, Mazoka, mr_osiris, Mustayan, notescribo, OSALRODO, Oximoron, picadogrueso, rapolita, redtoro, riskiewinner, Rodion, sabrina, sancho18, Semrush [Bot], Sir, Tecnicalpro, vgvictor, Viruela y 2094 invitados