martin escribió:![]()
Atrevido que cuentas raras que haces....
|
Bienvenido a los foros de Rava Bursátil. Si todavía no lo hiciste, te invitamos a registrarte gratis para poder participar. Recibirás información sobre los mercados y nuestros servicios. Si ya sos usuario, podés identificarte para desactivar este aviso. |
martin escribió:![]()
atrevido escribió: Hoy pagando 13.10 (sumale un 17 % de caucion que garpas anualmente por la caucion),tenes un cupon precorte a tu medida de 15,327.
Si le resto a 15,32 los 9.25 que nos pagan me queda que estoy reinvirtiendo a 6 pesos algo que paga, repito, minimamente 11,37![]()
Es de locos.Pero es asi.![]()
REINVERSION A 6 PESOS!!!![]()
L
apolo1102 escribió:Atentos....
Credit Suisse
FIXED INCOME RESEARCH & ANALYTICS
Research Notification
EM: More upside
The Fed’s signal last week that it will keep rates at the zero bound at least until late 2014, or perhaps even longer, has strengthened the argument for being long EM assets. Even more importantly, the compression of credit spreads in Italy and Spain, as well as the reduction of stress in the European banking sector following the injection of liquidity by the ECB, removed in the mind of investors the risk of an imminent collapse in Europe. Simultaneously, global growth data have strengthened, reducing the risk of a collapse of demand for EM exports.
Emerging market spreads, currencies, and interest rates have promptly advanced since the beginning of January. We argue, however, that there is still value in each of these asset classes, but with important caveats. The case for being long rates is undermined by the rally that has already occurred and by the very aggressive pricing of US and G3 bonds. In our view, investors should stay close to the benchmark or even underweight duration in their local market portfolios, while emphasizing currency carry. We still see value in EM FX given very loose core monetary policy and falling market volatility – a combination that invites a search for yield. However, EM currencies have recovered quicker and fuller than less liquid investments, and we see lesser upside potential precisely in the countries with stronger fundamentals, such as Latam exporters. Finally, we think that EM sovereign hard currency bonds have ample room to catch up to developed corporates: Their underperformance in the January rally has been notable.
apolo1102 escribió:Atentos....
Credit Suisse: FIXED INCOME RESEARCH & ANALYTICS
Research Notification
EM: More upside
The Fed’s signal last week that it will keep rates at the zero bound at least until late 2014, or perhaps even longer, has strengthened the argument for being long EM assets. Even more importantly, the compression of credit spreads in Italy and Spain, as well as the reduction of stress in the European banking sector following the injection of liquidity by the ECB, removed in the mind of investors the risk of an imminent collapse in Europe. Simultaneously, global growth data have strengthened, reducing the risk of a collapse of demand for EM exports.
Emerging market spreads, currencies, and interest rates have promptly advanced since the beginning of January. We argue, however, that there is still value in each of these asset classes, but with important caveats. The case for being long rates is undermined by the rally that has already occurred and by the very aggressive pricing of US and G3 bonds. In our view, investors should stay close to the benchmark or even underweight duration in their local market portfolios, while emphasizing currency carry. We still see value in EM FX given very loose core monetary policy and falling market volatility – a combination that invites a search for yield. However, EM currencies have recovered quicker and fuller than less liquid investments, and we see lesser upside potential precisely in the countries with stronger fundamentals, such as Latam exporters. Finally, we think that EM sovereign hard currency bonds have ample room to catch up to developed corporates: Their underperformance in the January rally has been notable.
de_a_poquito escribió: A mi casa (Belgrano R) me llegaron ya las boletas de Metrogás y de Edenor con vencimiento estos días, ambas con subsidio, un solo monto (los home bankings te alertaban estos días que te podían venir dos montos, uno con y otro sin subsidio) y sin ningún cuestionario para determinar si siguen otorgando el subsidio o no.
pablo9494 escribió: Que buen barrio...me encanta Belgrano R, la unica parte de ese barrio donde se respira glamour, las viejas casonas estilo ingles, calles adoquinadas perfectas, buena seguridad, arboleda...hermosa zona!![]()
de_a_poquito escribió: Jejeje, Pablín...siempre "sufriendo" vos respecto de los gustos en vida....
de_a_poquito escribió: A mi casa (Belgrano R) me llegaron ya las boletas de Metrogás y de Edenor con vencimiento estos días, ambas con subsidio, un solo monto (los home bankings te alertaban estos días que te podían venir dos montos, uno con y otro sin subsidio) y sin ningún cuestionario para determinar si siguen otorgando el subsidio o no.
pablo9494 escribió: Que buen barrio...me encanta Belgrano R, la unica parte de ese barrio donde se respira glamour, las viejas casonas estilo ingles, calles adoquinadas perfectas, buena seguridad, arboleda...hermosa zona!![]()
de_a_poquito escribió:A mi casa (Belgrano R) me llegaron ya las boletas de Metrogás y de Edenor con vencimiento estos días, ambas con subsidio, un solo monto (los home bankings te alertaban estos días que te podían venir dos montos, uno con y otro sin subsidio) y sin ningún cuestionario para determinar si siguen otorgando el subsidio o no.
AlfredoRago escribió:Que periodo te están facturando? Porque si es Noviembre-Diciembre, todavía figura el subsidio, retirado a partir del 1º de enero.
de_a_poquito escribió: A mi casa (Belgrano R) me llegaron ya las boletas de Metrogás y de Edenor con vencimiento estos días, ambas con subsidio, un solo monto (los home bankings te alertaban estos días que te podían venir dos montos, uno con y otro sin subsidio) y sin ningún cuestionario para determinar si siguen otorgando el subsidio o no.
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: Ahrefs [Bot], Ajoyagua, algunavezlavoyapegar, Amazon [Bot], andy_cayn, Ayaxayante, BACK UP, Baidu [Spider], bariloche, Berkut, Bing [Bot], bohemio33, caballo, cabeza70, cad845, carbar, chewbaca, Chimango, Chuikov, Chumbi, Citizen, daimio, debenede, DeSTRoY, DON VINCENZO, el aprendiz, el indio, El mismísimo, elcipayo16, ElCorredorX, ELViS_PRESLEY, escolazo21, excluido, Fercap, frankcores, Funebrero, gago, Google [Bot], Guardameta, guilmi, GYCCO39, Hayfuturo, heide, Hermes438, Itzae77, jerry1962, jose enrique, Leon, ljoeo, Majestic-12 [Bot], mr_osiris, Onore, OSALRODO, PAC, pepelastra, Pirujo, redtoro, Robespierre, sebara, Semrush [Bot], Sir, TELEMACO, trantor, Viruela, zippo y 1283 invitados