No deberian tener merito esas demandas, ver lo puntos:
Cresud is the majority owner of IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima ("IRSA"). Dolphin Netherlands B.V. ("Dolphin") is a subsidiary of IRSA. According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period defendants issued false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Dolphin does not adequately qualify as a Venture Capital Organization, and therefore, IDB Development Corporation Limited's ("IDBD") $6.7 billion net debt should be consolidated with IRSA's financial statements; (RESUELTO DESDE EL TRIMESTRE PASADO CUANDO IDB CONSOLIDO BALANCE EN IRSA)(2) as such, Cresud's financial statements failed to consolidate IDBD's $6.7 billion net debt; (IDEM ANTERIOR) (3) IRSA's impending consolidation of IDBD's debt would violate IRSA's Global Notes Indenture, as IRSA would be in breach of the "Incurrence of Additional Indebtedness" covenant, which prohibits its EBITDA to interest coverage ratio to be less than 1.75x; and (4) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. (YA RESCATARON/MODIFICARON LAS ON CON ESTAS CLAUSULAS)
Ademas durante 2015 no hubo perdidas significativas de la accion y la caida 2016 se debe gran parte a estas demandas y al articulo short que las origino (en seekingalpha)... y tampoco fue una caida catastrofica.
En mi opinion, no tienen merito y si llegase a haber algun acuerdo, sera inmaterial.